Exploring the Differences Between Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema in Data Warehousing 

BlogsData Engineering

Star Schema vs Snowflake schema

image source

Understanding the Fundamentals of Star Schema 

Star schema

image source

The Star Schema is a basic data modeling approach in data warehousing and business intelligence applications. It is a type of dimensional modeling that manages data into a central fact table surrounded by dimension tables. This structure provides an efficient and intuitive way to analyze large amounts of data. 

At the core of the Star Schema is the fact table and surrounding the fact table are the dimension tables, which provide contextual information about the facts. These dimensions can include details such as time, location, product, customer, and other relevant attributes. 

Benefits of Star Schema: 

  • It simplifies data modeling and querying as the star schema design separates data into fact and dimension tables, making the data structure easier to understand. 
  • Queries in a star schema are typically faster because the data is organized in a denormalized structure, reducing the need for complex joins. 
  • The dimensional model allows for greater flexibility in creating reports and performing ad-hoc analyses, as users can easily slice and dice the data along different dimensions. 
  • Star schemas can handle large volumes of data and support high concurrency, making them suitable for enterprise-level data warehousing and business intelligence applications.
  • The separation of fact and dimension tables helps maintain data integrity and ensures consistency in the reported metrics. 

Understanding the Fundamentals of Snowflake Schema

Snowflake schema

image source

The Snowflake Schema is a variation of the widely adopted Star Schema, a dimensional data model used in data warehousing. This refined approach to data modeling offers enhanced flexibility and scalability, making it an attractive choice for organizations seeking to optimize their data management strategies. 

At the Snowflake Schema's core is the normalization concept, where data is organized into a series of interconnected tables, each representing a specific dimension. Unlike the Star Schema, the Snowflake Schema extends this structure by introducing additional levels of dimension tables, creating a more granular and hierarchical data model. 

The benefits of Snowflake schema:

  • The Snowflake Schema minimizes data duplication by breaking down dimensions into smaller, more specialized tables, leading to more efficient data storage and management. 
  • The hierarchical nature of the Snowflake Schema allows for more targeted and efficient queries, as the data is organized in a way that aligns with common business questions and reporting needs. 
  • The modular design of the Snowflake Schema enables easier maintenance, updates, and modifications to the data model, making it adaptable to changing business requirements. 

Key Differences Between Star Schema and Snowflake Schema 

The key differences between the Star Schema and Snowflake Schema in data warehousing are as follows: 

1. Structure:

Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema

image source

Star Schemas:

In a star schema, the central fact table is surrounded by dimension tables in a radial pattern, resembling a star shape. The fact table contains the quantitative data measurements, while the dimension tables provide contextual information.

Snowflake schemas:

The snowflake schema takes the star schema a step further by normalizing the dimension tables. Instead of having a single-dimension table, the snowflake schema breaks down dimensions into multiple tables connected by foreign key relationships. This results in a more complex, hierarchical structure. 

2. Query Performance:

Star Schema

The star schema is characterized by a central fact table surrounded by dimension tables. This denormalized structure simplifies queries and often results in faster performance, as the data is organized in a more intuitive and accessible manner. Queries can typically be executed more efficiently, as they can leverage the pre-aggregated data in the fact table. 

Snowflake schema

The snowflake schema introduces an additional level of normalization, with dimension tables further divided into subdimension tables. While this approach can lead to a more organized and maintainable data model, it can also result in more complex queries and potentially slower performance, as the data is spread across multiple tables. 

3. Storage Requirements:

Star Schema

In a star schema, the central fact table is surrounded by denormalized dimension tables. This design results in fewer tables and fewer relationships, which can translate to more efficient storage utilization. The denormalized dimension tables contain all the relevant attributes, minimizing the need for joins and reducing the overall storage footprint. 

Snowflake Schema

The snowflake schema takes a more normalized approach, where dimension tables are further broken down into multiple tables connected by foreign key relationships. This structure can lead to a larger number of tables and more complex relationships. The snowflake schema results in increased storage requirements due to the additional tables and the need for more join operations. 

4. Flexibility:

Star Schema

The star schema is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It consists of a central fact table encircled by dimension tables, creating a straightforward and intuitive data structure. This design allows for efficient querying and reporting, making it a popular choice for many organizations. 

Snowflake schema

The snowflake schema introduces an additional level of normalization by breaking down the dimension tables into further sub-dimensions. This results in a more complex, hierarchical structure that can provide greater flexibility in data analysis. However, this increased complexity can also lead to slower query performance, especially for queries that require traversing multiple levels of the schema. 

5. Denormalization:

Star Schema

In a star schema, the central fact table is denormalized by incorporating attributes from the dimension tables directly into the fact table. This redundancy reduces the need for joins, improving query speed.

Snowflake Schema

The snowflake schema maintains a more normalized structure. While this approach reduces data redundancy, it can result in more complex queries and potentially slower performance, especially for queries that require traversing multiple levels of the hierarchy. 

Choosing the Right Schema: Factors to Consider 

The selection of the appropriate schema for a data warehouse is a critical decision that can significantly impact the performance, scalability, and maintainability of the system.

Key considerations when selecting a schema: 

  • Volume and Complexity of Data: Star schemas are generally more suitable for large, complex datasets, while snowflake schemas may be more appropriate for smaller, less complex data structures. 
  • Query Performance: Star schemas tend to offer better query performance due to their simpler structure, while snowflake schemas can provide more flexibility in query formulation. 
  • Maintenance and Scalability: Star schemas are typically easier to maintain and scale as the data warehouse grows, whereas snowflake schemas may require more effort to manage changes and expansions. 
  • Reporting and Analytical Requirements: The choice of schema should align with the specific reporting and analytical needs of the organization, as different schemas may be better suited for different types of analysis. 

Conclusion:

The choice between a star schema or a snowflake schema should be made based on the specific needs of the organization. Star schemas are generally preferred for their simplicity and faster query execution, while snowflake schemas offer a more granular and flexible data model, which can be beneficial for complex analytical requirements. 

Frequently Asked Questions FAQs - Star schema vs snowflake schema

What is snowflake schema? 

Snowflake schema is a type of multidimensional database design that is an extension of the star schema. It is called "snowflake" because the schema diagram resembles a snowflake shape. In a snowflake schema, the central fact table is surrounded by dimension tables, and these dimension tables can be further normalized into additional tables, creating a hierarchical structure.

What is star schema? 

A star schema is a type of multidimensional database design that consists of one or more fact tables referencing any number of dimension tables. The fact table contains the measures or metrics of the business, while the dimension tables contain the attributes that describe the facts.

What is the difference between snowflake schema and star schema? 

The main difference between the snowflake schema and the star schema is the level of normalization in the dimension tables. In a star schema, the dimension tables are denormalized, while in a snowflake schema, the dimension tables are further normalized into additional tables.

What is a snowflake schema example? 

An example of a snowflake schema would be a sales database for a retail company. The central fact table would be the sales transactions, and the dimension tables would include customer, product, time, and location.

Why is star schema preferred over snowflake schema? 

Star schema is generally preferred over snowflake schema for a few reasons: 

  • The star schema is a more straightforward design, which can make it easier to understand and maintain. 
  • The denormalized structure of the star schema can result in faster query performance, particularly for queries that involve aggregations and filtering on a single level of the hierarchy. 
  • The star schema can be more flexible and easier to modify as the business requirements change, as the normalization process in the snowflake schema can make it more difficult to add or change dimensions. 

What is the difference between star schema and normal schema? 

The main difference between a star schema and a normal schema is the way the data is structured and organized. In a normal schema, the data is organized into multiple tables, with each table representing a specific entity or concept, and the relationships between these entities are defined through foreign key relationships whereas, in a star schema, the data is organized into a central fact table that contains the measures or metrics of the business, and this fact table is surrounded by dimension tables that contain the attributes that describe the facts.

What is the snowflake schema used for? 

Snowflake schema is typically used in data warehousing and business intelligence applications where complex and hierarchical data structures are common. The key use cases for snowflake schema include: multidimensional analysis, flexibility and extensibility, improved query performance

What is the purpose of the snowflake schema? 

The primary purpose of the snowflake schema is to provide a more flexible and scalable data modeling approach for data warehousing and business intelligence applications.

What is the difference between Star schema vs Snowflake schema vs Vault? 

Star Schema is a denormalized design with a central fact table and surrounding dimension tables and is Optimized for fast query performance. Snowflake Schema has a normalized design with a central fact table and dimension tables that are further normalized and optimized for complex queries and analysis . Whereas, Data Vault is a highly normalized design focused on capturing historical changes and maintaining data lineage.

Written by
Rupal Sharma

Blogs

Exploring the Differences Between Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema in Data Warehousing